Manufacturing method for optical recording medium, optical recording medium, optical information device, and information reproducing method

ABSTRACT

Shape-wise thicknesses tr 1 , tr 2 , . . . , and trN of a cover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediate layers of an optical recording medium having refractive indexes nr 1 , nr 2 , . . . , and nrN are converted into thicknesses t 1 , t 2 , . . . , and tN which are calculated by products of a function f(n)=−1.088n 3 +6.1027n 2 −12.042n+9.1007 where n=nr 1 , nr 2 , . . . , and nrN.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.61/236,743 filed Aug. 25, 2009.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an optical recording medium forinformation recording or reproducing by irradiated light, amanufacturing method for the optical recording medium, an opticalinformation device for recording or reproducing information with respectto the optical recording medium, and an information reproducing methodfor reproducing information from the optical recording medium; and moreparticularly to an interlayer structure of an optical recording mediumhaving three or more information recording surfaces.

2. Description of the Background Art

There are known optical discs called as DVD or BD (Blu-ray disc), asexamples of the commercially available high-density and large-capacityoptical information recording media. In recent years, the optical discshave become widely used as recording media for recording images, music,and computer-readable data. There also has been proposed an optical dischaving plural recording layers, as disclosed in JP 2001-155380A and JP2008-117513A, to further increase the recording capacity.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an arrangement of a conventional opticalrecording medium and optical head device. An optical recording medium401 includes a first information recording surface 401 a closest to asurface 401 z of the optical recording medium 401, a second informationrecording surface 401 b second closest to the surface 401 z of theoptical recording medium 401, a third information recording surface 401c third closest to the surface 401 z of the optical recording medium401, and a fourth information recording surface 401 d farthest from thesurface 401 z of the optical recording medium 401.

A divergent beam 70 emitted from a light source 1 is transmitted througha collimator lens 53, and incident into a polarized beam splitter 52.The beam 70 incident into the polarized beam splitter 52 is transmittedthrough the polarized beam splitter 52, and converted into circularlypolarized light while being transmitted through a quarter wavelengthplate 54. Thereafter, the beam 70 is converted into a convergent beamthrough an objective lens 56, transmitted through a transparentsubstrate of the optical recording medium 401, and collected on one ofthe first information recording surface 401 a, the second informationrecording surface 401 b, the third information recording surface 401 c,and the fourth information recording surface 401 d formed in theinterior of the optical recording medium 401.

The objective lens 56 is so designed as to make a spherical aberrationzero at an intermediate depth position between the first informationrecording surface 401 a and the fourth information recording surface 401d. A spherical aberration corrector 93 shifts the position of thecollimator lens 53 in an optical axis direction. Thereby, sphericalaberration resulting from collecting light on the first through thefourth information recording surfaces 401 a through 401 d is removed.

An aperture 55 restricts the opening of the objective lens 56, and setsthe numerical aperture NA of the objective lens 56 to 0.85. The beam 70reflected on the fourth information recording surface 401 d istransmitted through the objective lens 56 and the quarter wavelengthplate 54, converted into linearly polarized light along an optical pathdisplaced by 90 degrees with respect to the outward path, and thenreflected on the polarized beam splitter 52. The beam 70 reflected onthe polarized beam splitter 52 is converted into convergent light whilebeing transmitted through a light collecting lens 59, and incident intoa photodetector 320 through a cylindrical lens 57. Astigmatism isimparted to the beam 70 while the beam 70 is transmitted through thecylindrical lens 57.

The photodetector 320 has unillustrated four light receiving sections.Each of the light receiving sections outputs a current signal dependingon a received light amount. A focus error (hereinafter, called as FE)signal by an astigmatism method, a tracking error (hereinafter, calledas TE) signal by a push-pull method, and an information (hereinaftercalled as RF) signal recorded in the optical recording medium 401 aregenerated, based on the current signals. The FE signal and the TE signalare amplified to an intended level, subjected to phase compensation, andthen supplied to actuators 91 and 92, whereby focus control and trackingcontrol are performed.

In this example, the following problem occurs, in the case where thethickness t1 between the surface 401 z of the optical recording medium401 and the first information recording surface 401 a, the thickness t2between the first information recording surface 401 a and the secondinformation recording surface 401 b, the thickness t3 between the secondinformation recording surface 401 b and the third information recordingsurface 401 c, and the thickness t4 between the third informationrecording surface 401 c and the fourth information recording surface 401d are equal to each other.

For instance, in the case where the beam 70 is collected on the fourthinformation recording surface 401 d to record or reproduce informationon or from the fourth information recording surface 401 d, a part of thebeam 70 is reflected on the third information recording surface 401 c.The distance from the third information recording surface 401 c to thefourth information recording surface 401 d, and the distance from thethird information recording surface 401 c to the second informationrecording surface 401 b are equal to each other. Accordingly, the partof the beam 70 reflected on the third information recording surface 401c forms an image on a backside of the second information recordingsurface 401 b, and reflected light from the backside of the secondinformation surface 401 b is reflected on the third informationrecording surface 401 c. As a result, the light reflected on the thirdinformation recording surface 401 c, the backside of the secondinformation recording surface 401 b, and the third information recordingsurface 401 c may be mixed with reflected light from the fourthinformation recording surface 401 d to be read.

Further, the distance from the second information recording surface 401b to the fourth information recording surface 401 d, and the distancefrom the second information recording surface 401 b to the surface 401 zof the optical recording medium 401 are equal to each other.Accordingly, a part of the beam 70 reflected on the second informationrecording surface 401 b forms an image on the backside of the surface401 z of the optical recording medium 401, and reflected light from thebackside of the surface 401 z is reflected on the second informationrecording surface 401 b. As a result, the light reflected on the secondinformation recording surface 401 b, the backside of the surface 401 z,and the second information recording surface 401 b may be mixed withreflected light from the fourth information recording surface 401 d tobe read.

As described above, there is a problem that reflected light from thefourth information recording surface 401 d to be read is superimposedand mixed with reflected light which forms an image on the backside ofthe other surface, with the result that informationrecording/reproducing is obstructed. Light containing reflected lightwhich forms an image on the backside of the other surface has a highcoherence, and forms a brightness/darkness distribution on a lightreceiving element by coherence. Since the brightness/darknessdistribution is varied depending on a change in phase difference withrespect to reflected light from the other surface, resulting from asmall thickness variation of an intermediate layer in an in-planedirection of an optical disc, the quality of a servo signal and areproduction signal may be considerably deteriorated. Hereinafter, theabove problem is called as a back focus problem in the specification.

In order to prevent the back focus problem, JP 2001-155380A discloses amethod, wherein the interlayer distance between the informationrecording surfaces is gradually increased in the order from the surface401 z of the optical recording medium 401 so that a part of the beam 70may not form an image on the backside of the second informationrecording surface 401 b and the backside of the surface 401 zsimultaneously when the beam 70 is collected on the fourth informationrecording surface 401 d to be read. The thicknesses t1 through t4 eachhas a production variation of ±10 μm. It is necessary to set thethicknesses t1 through t4 to different values from each other, also in acase where the thicknesses t1 through t4 are varied. In view of this, adifference in the thicknesses t1 through t4 is set to e.g. 20 μm. Inthis example, the thicknesses t1 through t4 are respectively set to 40μm, 60 μm, 80 μm, and 100 μm, and the total interlayer thicknesst(=t2+t3+t4) from the first information recording surface 401 a to thefourth information recording layer 401 d is set to 240 μm.

In the case where the thickness of a cover layer from the surface 401 zto the first information recording surface 401 a, and the thickness fromthe fourth information recording surface 401 d to the first informationrecording surface 401 a are equal to each other, light reflected on thefourth information recording surface 401 d is focused on the surface 401z, and reflected on the surface 401 z. The light reflected on thesurface 401 z is reflected on the fourth information recording surface401 d, and guided to the photodetector 320. A light flux which forms animage on the backside of the surface 401 z does not have informationrelating to pits or marks, unlike a light flux which forms an image onthe backside of the other information recording surface. However, in thecase where the number of information recording surfaces is large, thelight amount of light returning from the information recording surfacesis reduced, and the reflectance of the surface 401 z is relativelyincreased. As a result, coherence between a light flux reflected on thebackside of the surface 401 z, and a light flux reflected on a targetedinformation recording surface to be recorded or reproduced is generatedin the similar manner as in the case of a light flux reflected on thebackside of the other information recording surfaces, which mayconsiderably deteriorate the quality of a servo signal and areproduction signal.

In view of the above problem, JP 2008-117513A proposes a distancebetween information recording layers (information recording surfaces) ofan optical disc. JP 2008-117513A discloses the following structure.

An optical recording medium has four information recording surfaces,wherein the first through the fourth information recording surfaces aredefined in the order from a side closest to a surface of the opticalrecording medium. The distance from the medium surface to the firstinformation recording surface is set to 47 μm or less. The thicknessesof intermediate layers between the first through the fourth informationrecording surfaces are combination of a range from 11 to 15 μm, a rangefrom 16 to 21 μm, and a range of 22 μm or more. The distance from themedium surface to the fourth information recording surface is set to 100μm. The distance from the medium surface to the first informationrecording surface is set to 47 μm or less, and the distance from themedium surface to the fourth information recording surface is set to 100μm.

An optical disc system is adapted to detect light incident from a mediumsurface and reflected on an information recording surface. Accordingly,a refractive index of a transparent material constituting a transparentmember from the medium surface where light is transmitted to theinformation recording surface also affects the quality of a servo signaland a reproduction signal. However, there is no consideration anddescription about the refractive index in the disc structures disclosedin JP 2001-155380A and JP 2008-117513A. Thus, both of the publicationsdo not consider an influence of a refractive index of a transparentmaterial on the quality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the above, an object of the invention is to provide anoptical recording medium manufacturing method, an optical recordingmedium, an optical information device, and an information reproducingmethod that enable to improve the quality of a servo signal and areproduction signal.

A manufacturing method for an optical recording medium according to anaspect of the invention is a manufacturing method for an opticalrecording medium having (N−1) (where N is a positive integer of 4 ormore) information recording surfaces, wherein, assuming that shape-wisethicknesses of a cover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediatelayers of the optical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1,nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in theorder from a surface of the optical recording medium where light isincident, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted intothicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of layers having a predeterminedrefractive index “no” which makes a divergent amount equal to adivergent amount of a light beam resulting from the thicknesses tr1,tr2, . . . , and trN; a difference DFF between the sum of a thickness“ti” through a thickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through athickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each anypositive integer satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N); and the thicknesses t1, t2, . .. , and tN are calculated by products of a function f(n) expressed bythe following formula (1), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , andtrN:f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (1)

in the formula (1), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

In the above arrangement, assuming that shape-wise thicknesses of acover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediate layers of an opticalrecording medium having refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN arerespectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from a surface ofthe optical recording medium where light is incident, the thicknessestr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted into thicknesses t1, t2, . . . ,and tN of layers having a predetermined refractive index “no” whichmakes a divergent amount equal to a divergent amount of a light beamresulting from the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN. Further, adifference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti” through a thickness“tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through a thickness “tm” is set to1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each any positive integersatisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , andtN are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (1), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , andtrN.

According to the invention, since the difference DFF between the sum ofthe thickness “ti” through the thickness “tj”, and the sum of thethickness “tk” through the thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more, it ispossible to prevent light from forming an image on the backside of thesurface of the optical recording medium, and suppress coherence betweenreflected light from the information recording surfaces to therebyimprove the quality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal.Further, since the distance between the surface of the optical recordingmedium and the information recording surface closest to the surface ofthe optical recording medium can be set to a large value, deteriorationof a reproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smearon the surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic arrangement of an opticalrecording medium embodying the invention, and an optical head device.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a layer structure of the optical recordingmedium in the embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing reflected light from a fourth informationrecording surface, in the case where a beam is collected on the fourthinformation recording surface.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing reflected light from a third informationrecording surface and a second information recording surface, in thecase where a beam is collected on the fourth information recordingsurface.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing reflected light from the second informationrecording surface and a surface of the optical recording medium, in thecase where a beam is collected on the fourth information recordingsurface.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing reflected light from the third informationrecording surface, a first information recording surface, and the secondinformation recording surface, in the case where a beam is collected onthe fourth information recording surface.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a relation between a difference ininterlayer thickness, and an amplitude of an FS signal.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a relation between an interlayer thicknessof an optical recording medium having information recording surfaces ofreflectances substantially equal to each other, and a jitter.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a layer structure of an optical recordingmedium as a modification of the embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive index dependenceof a factor for converting a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actualrefractive index into a thickness in terms of a standard refractiveindex.

FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive index dependenceof a factor for converting a thickness in terms of a standard refractiveindex into a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actual refractiveindex.

FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive index dependenceof a factor for converting a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actualrefractive index into a thickness in terms of a standard refractiveindex, based on a spherical aberration.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a schematic arrangement of an opticalinformation device embodying the invention.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an arrangement of a conventional opticalrecording medium and optical head device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

In the following, an embodiment of the invention is described referringto the accompanying drawings. The following embodiment is merely anexample embodying the invention, and does not limit the technical scopeof the invention.

Firstly, an optical recording medium embodying the invention isdescribed referring to FIGS. 1 and 2.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic arrangement of an opticalrecording medium embodying the invention, and an optical head device.FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a layer structure of the optical recordingmedium in the embodiment. An optical head device 201 irradiates bluelaser light whose wavelength λ is 405 nm onto an optical recordingmedium 40 to reproduce a signal recorded in the optical recording medium40. Since the arrangement and the operation of the optical head device201 shown in FIG. 1 are substantially the same as the arrangement andthe operation of the optical head device shown in FIG. 14, detaileddescription thereof is omitted herein.

The optical recording medium 40 as an example has four informationrecording surfaces. As shown in FIG. 2, the optical recording medium 40has, in the order from a side closest to a surface 40 z of the opticalrecording medium 40, a first information recording surface 40 a, asecond information recording surface 40 b, a third information recordingsurface 40 c, and a fourth information recording surface 40 d.

The optical recording medium 40 is further provided with a cover layer42, a first intermediate layer 43, a second intermediate layer 44, and athird intermediate layer 45. The thickness t1 of the cover layer 42represents a thickness of a substrate from the surface 40 z to the firstinformation recording surface 40 a, the thickness t2 of the firstintermediate layer 43 represents a thickness of the substrate from thefirst information recording surface 40 a to the second informationrecording surface 40 b, the thickness t3 of the second intermediatelayer 44 represents a thickness of the substrate from the secondinformation recording surface 40 b to the third information recordingsurface 40 c, and the thickness t4 of the third intermediate layer 45represents a thickness of the substrate from the third informationrecording surface 40 c to the fourth information recording surface 40 d.

The distance d1 (≈t1) represents a distance from the surface 40 z to thefirst information recording surface 40 a, the distance d2 (≈t1+t2)represents a distance from the surface 40 z to the second informationrecording surface 40 b, the distance d3 (≈t1+t2+t3) represents adistance from the surface 40 z to the third information recordingsurface 40 c, and the distance d4 (≈t1+t2+t3+t4) represents a distancefrom the surface 40 z to the fourth information recording surface 40 d.

Now, problems to be solved in the case where an optical recording mediumhas four information recording surfaces are described. Coherence betweenreflected light from multiple surfaces is described referring to FIGS. 3through 7, as a first problem to be solved.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing reflected light from the fourth informationrecording surface 40 d, in the case where a beam is collected on thefourth information recording surface 40 d. FIG. 4 is a diagram showingreflected light from the third information recording surface 40 c andthe second information recording surface 40 b, in the case where a beamis collected on the fourth information recording surface 40 d. FIG. 5 isa diagram showing reflected light from the second information recordingsurface 40 b and the surface 40 z, in the case where a beam is collectedon the fourth information recording surface 40 d. FIG. 6 is a diagramshowing reflected light from the third information recording surface 40c, the first information recording surface 40 a, and the secondinformation recording surface 40 b, in the case where a beam iscollected on the fourth information recording surface 40 d.

As shown in FIG. 3, a light flux collected on the fourth informationrecording surface 40 d for information reproducing or recording is splitinto the following light beams by semi-translucency of an informationrecording layer (an information recording surface).

Specifically, a light flux collected on the fourth information recordingsurface 40 d for information reproducing or recording is split into: abeam 70 shown in FIG. 3; a beam 71 (back focus light with respect to aninformation recording surface) shown in FIG. 4, a beam 72 (back focuslight with respect to a medium surface) shown in FIG. 5, and a beam 73shown in FIG. 6.

As shown in FIG. 3, the beam 70 is a beam reflected on the fourthinformation recording surface 40 d and emitted from the surface 40 z. Asshown in FIG. 4, the beam 71 is a beam reflected on the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c, focused and reflected on thebackside of the second information recording surface 40 b, reflected onthe third information recording surface 40 c, and emitted from thesurface 40 z. As shown in FIG. 5, the beam 72 is a beam reflected on thesecond information recording surface 40 b, focused and reflected on thebackside of the surface 40 z, reflected on the second informationrecording surface 40 b, and emitted from the surface 40 z. As shown inFIG. 6, the beam 73 is a beam which is not focused on the surface 40 zand the backsides of the information recording surfaces, but isreflected in the order of the third information recording surface 40 c,the backside of the first information recording surface 40 a, and thesecond information recording surface 40 b, and emitted from the surface40 z.

First, let us consider a case that the refractive indexes of the coverlayer 42, the first intermediate layer 43, the second intermediate layer44, and the third intermediate layer 45 are equal to each other. In thiscase, the refractive indexes of the respective corresponding layers areset to “no”.

For instance, in the case where the distance (thickness t4) between thefourth information recording surface 40 d and the third informationrecording surface 40 c, and the distance (thickness t3) between thethird information recording surface 40 c and the second informationrecording surface 40 b are equal to each other, the beam 70 and the beam71 pass a common optical path when exiting from the surface 40 z.Accordingly, the beam 70 and the beam 71 are incident into aphotodetector 320 with an identical light flux diameter. Similarly, inthe case where the distance (thickness t4+thickness t3) between thefourth information recording surface 40 d and the second informationrecording surface 40 b, and the distance (thickness t2+thickness t1)between the second information recording surface 40 b and the surface 40z are equal to each other, the beam 70 and the beam 72 pass a commonoptical path when exiting from the surface 40 z. Accordingly, the beam70 and the beam 72 are incident into the photodetector 320 with anidentical light flux diameter. In the case where the distance (thicknesst2) between the second information recording surface 40 b and the firstinformation recording surface 40 a, and the distance (thickness t4)between the fourth information recording surface 40 d and the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c are equal to each other, the beam 70and the beam 73 pass a common optical path when exiting from the surface40 z. Accordingly, the beam 70 and the beam 73 are incident into thephotodetector 320 with an identical light flux diameter.

The light intensities of the beams 71 through 73 as reflected light frommultiple surfaces are small, as compared with the light intensity of thebeam 70. However, coherent contrast does not depend on a light intensitybut depends on a light intensity ratio of light amplitude, and the lightamplitude is a square root of the light intensity. Accordingly, even asmall difference between light intensities results in a large coherentcontrast. In the case where the beams 70 through 73 are incident intothe photodetector 320 with an identical light flux diameter, aninfluence by coherence between the beams is large. Further, a lightreceiving amount by the photodetector 320 is greatly varied, resultingfrom a small change in thickness between the information recordingsurfaces, which makes it difficult to stably detect a signal.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a relation between a difference ininterlayer thickness, and an amplitude of an FS signal. FIG. 7 shows anamplitude of an FS signal (the sum of light intensities) with respect toa difference in interlayer thickness, in the case where the lightintensity ratio between the beam 70; and the beam 71, or the beam 72, orthe beam 73 is set to 100:1, and the refractive indexes of the coverlayer 42 and the first intermediate layer 43 are each set to about 1.60(1.57). Referring to FIG. 7, the axis of abscissas indicates adifference in interlayer thickness, and the axis of ordinate indicatesan amplitude of an FS signal. The FS signal amplitude is a valueobtained by normalizing light solely composed of the beam 70 to bedetected by the photodetector 320 by a DC light amount, assuming thatthere is no reflection from the other information recording surfaces. Inthis embodiment, an interlayer means a layer between a surface of theoptical recording medium and an information recording surface, and alayer between information recording surfaces adjacent to each other. Asshown in FIG. 7, it is obvious that the FS signal is sharply changedwhen the difference in interlayer thickness becomes about 1 μm or less.

Similarly to the beam 72 shown in FIG. 5, in the case where thedifference between the thickness t1 of the cover layer 42, and the sum(t2+t3+t4) of the thicknesses of the first through the thirdintermediate layers 43 through 45 is 1 μm or less, a problem such asvariation of the FS signal also occurs.

As a second problem to be solved, an exceedingly small interlayerdistance between adjacent information recording surfaces causes aninfluence of crosstalk from the adjacent information recording surface.In view of this, an interlayer distance of a predetermined value or moreis necessary. Accordingly, various interlayer thicknesses areinvestigated, and an interlayer thickness which minimizes the influenceis determined.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a relation between an interlayer thicknessof an optical recording medium having information recording surfaceshaving reflectances substantially equal to each other, and a jitter. Therefractive index of the intermediate layer is set to about 1.60.Referring to FIG. 8, the axis of abscissas indicates an interlayerthickness, and the axis of ordinate indicates a jitter value. As theinterlayer thickness is reduced, the jitter is deteriorated. Theinterlayer thickness where the jitter starts increasing is about 10 μm,and in the case where the interlayer thickness becomes 10 μm or less,the jitter is seriously deteriorated. Therefore, an optimum minimumvalue of the interlayer thickness is 10 μm.

Referring to FIG. 2, an arrangement of the optical recording medium 40in the embodiment of the invention is described. In the embodiment, thestructure of a four-layer disc (the optical recording medium 40) isdefined in such a manner as to secure the following conditions (1)through (3) in order to eliminate an adverse effect of reflected lightfrom the other information recording surfaces or a disc surface,considering a thickness variation among products.

Condition (1): The difference between the thickness t1 of the coverlayer 42, and the sum (t2+t3+t4) of the thicknesses t2 through t4 of thefirst through the third intermediate layers 43 through 45 is set to 1 μmor more. In other words, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 satisfy|t1−(t2+t3+t4)|≧1 μm.

Condition (2): The difference between any two values of the thicknessest1, t2, t3, and t4 is set to 1 μm or more in any case.

Condition (3): The difference between the sum (t1+t2) of the thicknesst1 of the cover layer 42 and the thickness t2 of the first intermediatelayer 43, and the sum (t3+t4) of the thickness t3 of the secondintermediate layer 44 and the thickness t4 of the third intermediatelayer 45 is set to 1 μm or more. In other words, the thicknesses t1, t2,t3, and t4 satisfy |(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm.

There are other combinations of interlayer thicknesses. However, in thecase where the thickness t1 of the cover layer is set to a valueapproximate to the sum (t2+t3+t4) of the thicknesses t2 through t4 ofthe first through the third intermediate layers 43 through 45, there isno need of considering the other combinations. Therefore, description onthe other combinations is omitted herein.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a layer structure of an optical recordingmedium as a modification of the embodiment of the invention. An opticalrecording medium 30 shown in FIG. 9 has three information recordingsurfaces. As shown in FIG. 9, the optical recording medium 30 has, inthe order from a side closest to a surface 30 z of the optical recordingmedium 30, a first information recording surface 30 a, a secondinformation recording surface 30 b, and a third information recordingsurface 30 c. The optical recording medium 30 is further provided with acover layer 32, a first intermediate layer 33, and a second intermediatelayer 34.

The thickness t1 of the cover layer 32 represents a thickness of asubstrate from the surface 30 z to the first information recordingsurface 30 a, the thickness t2 of the first intermediate layer 33represents a thickness of the substrate from the first informationrecording surface 30 a to the second information recording surface 30 b,and the thickness t3 of the second intermediate layer 34 represents athickness of the substrate from the second information recording surface30 b to the third information recording surface 30 c.

The distance d1 (≈t1) represents a distance from the surface 30 z to thefirst information recording surface 30 a, the distance d2 (≈t1+t2)represents a distance from the surface 30 z to the second informationrecording surface 30 b, and the distance d3 (≈t1+t2+t3) represents adistance from the surface 30 z to the third information recordingsurface 30 c.

In the foregoing description, the structure of the four-layer disc isconcretely described. In the case where a three-layer disc as shown inFIG. 9 is produced, the structure of the three-layer disc (the opticalrecording medium 30) is defined in such a manner as to secure thefollowing conditions (1) and (2).

Condition (1): The difference between the thickness t1 of the coverlayer 32, and the sum (t2+t3) of the thicknesses t2 and t3 of the firstintermediate layer 33 and the second intermediate layer 34 is set to 1μm or more. In other words, the optical recording medium 30 satisfies|t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm.

Condition (2): The difference between any two values of the thicknessest1, t2, and t3 is set to 1 μm or more in any case.

Concerning a (N−1)-layer disc (where n is a positive integer equal to ormore than 4), the above condition generally means that a differencebetween the sum of the thickness “ti” through the thickness “tj”, andthe sum of the thickness “tk” through the thickness “tm” is necessarilyset to 1 μm or more, assuming that t1 is a thickness of the cover layer,and t2 through tN are thicknesses of the first through the N-thintermediate layers, where i, j, k, and m are each any positive integersatisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N. The cover layer thickness corresponds to adistance from the surface of the optical recording medium to theinformation recording surface closest to the medium surface. The abovedescription is applied to the description that a distance from thesurface of the optical recording medium to the information recordingsurface second closest to the medium surface is defined as d2, adistance from the surface of the optical recording medium to theinformation recording surface third closest to the medium surface isdefined as d3, and a distance from the surface of the optical recordingmedium to the information recording surface fourth closest to the mediumsurface is defined as d4 in the same manner as described above.

Further, all the intermediate layer thicknesses are each set to 10 μm ormore to solve the second problem.

The foregoing description has been made based on the premise that therefractive indexes of the cover layer and the intermediate layers areequal to the standard value, and all the refractive indexes of the coverlayer and the intermediate layers are equal to each other. In thefollowing, described is a case that the refractive indexes of the coverlayer and the intermediate layers are different from the standard value,or the refractive indexes of the cover layer and the intermediate layersare different from each other among the layers.

The back focus problem as the first problem occurs because the size andthe shape are similar to each other between signal light, and reflectedlight from the other information recording surface on the photodetector320. In the case where the refractive index is set to about 1.60, it ispossible to avoid the back focus problem, as far as a difference betweenthe focus position of signal light, and the focus position of reflectedlight from the other information recording surface is smaller than 1 μmin the optical axis direction on the side of the optical recordingmedium. When the refractive index is set to about 1.60, crosstalkresulting from an adjacent information recording surface, as the secondproblem, occurs in the case where a defocus amount of signal light issmaller than 10 μm on an adjacent track.

In both of the cases, a defocus amount is an important factor to beconsidered. The defocus amount corresponds to the size of reflectedlight from the other information recording surface, or the size of avirtual image of reflected light from the other information recordingsurface at a position where signal light is focused. Let it be assumedthat the radius of reflected light from the other information recordingsurface, or the radius of a virtual image of reflected light from theother information recording surface is RD. Since reflected light fromthe other information recording surface whose radius is RD is projectedonto the photodetector 320, coherence and the magnitude of crosstalkdepend on the size of the reflected light. The size of the reflectedlight may be defined as a divergent amount of light resulting from aninterlayer thickness. The inventors found that in order to avoid theback focus problem and the crosstalk problem in the case where therefractive index is set to a value other than 1.60, it is necessary todefine a condition that makes a defocus amount i.e. the size ofreflected light from the other information recording surface or the sizeof a virtual image of reflected light from the other informationrecording surface substantially equal to each other. The above techniquemay be defined as a technique of converting an interlayer thickness,referring to a divergent amount of light resulting from an interlayerthickness.

Since the size of the photodetector is fixed, as the radius of a lightbeam is increased, the density of light to be incident into thephotodetector is decreased. As the density of light is decreased,crosstalk is decreased. Thus, the magnitude of crosstalk depends on thesize of reflected light.

A condition that makes a defocus (the size of reflected light from theother information recording surface, or the size of a virtual image ofreflected light from the other information recording surface) withrespect to a layer having a refractive index “nr” different from astandard refractive index “no” and a shape-wise thickness “tr” equal toa defocus with respect to a layer having the standard refractive index“no” and a shape-wise thickness “to” is expressed by the followingformulas (2) and (3).NA=nr·sin(θr)=no·sin(θo)  (2)RD=tr·tan(θr)=to·tan(θo)  (3)

In the formulas, NA represents a numerical aperture of an objective lens56 for converging light onto an optical recording medium. For instance,NA=0.85. The symbols θr and θo respectively represent convergence anglesof light in materials having the refractive index “nr” and therefractive index “no”. The symbol RD represents a radius of reflectedlight from the other information recording surface, or a radius of avirtual image of reflected light from the other information recordingsurface. The symbols “sin” and “tan” respectively represent a sinefunction and a tangent function. The standard refractive index “no” isset to e.g. 1.60, and more preferably set to 1.57.

The convergence angle θr is expressed by the following formula (4), andthe convergence angle θo is expressed by the following formula (5),based on the formula (2).θr=arcsin(NA/nr)  (4)θo=arcsin(NA/no)  (5)

In the formulas, arcsin represents an inverse sine function.

The thickness “to” is expressed by the following formula (6), and thethickness “tr” is expressed by the following formula (7), based on theformula (3).to=tr·tan(θr)/tan(θo)  (6)tr=to·tan(θo)/tan(θr)  (7)

The thickness “to” is calculated using the formula (6) to derive thethickness of a layer having the refractive index “no” with respect tothe shape-wise thickness “tr” of a layer having the refractive index“nr”.

Conversely, the thickness “tr” is calculated using the formula (7) toderive the shape-wise thickness “tr” of a layer having the refractiveindex “nr” with respect to the thickness “to” of a layer having therefractive index “no”.

The factor portion in the formula (6) i.e. tan(θr)/tan(θo) is expressedas a function f(nr) of the refractive index “nr” in FIG. 10. The factorportion in the formula (7) i.e. tan(θo)/tan(θr) is an inverse number1/f(nr) of the function f(nr). The factor portion tan(θo)/tan(θr) isexpressed as the inverse number 1/f(nr) of the function f(nr) of therefractive index “nr” in FIG. 11.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive index dependenceof a factor for converting a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actualrefractive index into a thickness in terms of a standard refractiveindex. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive indexdependence of a factor for converting a thickness in terms of a standardrefractive index into a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actualrefractive index.

Since both of the function f(nr) and the inverse number 1/f(nr) of thefunction f(nr) have a smooth curve, the function f(nr) and the inversenumber 1/f(nr) of the function f(nr) can be expressed by polynomialexpressions. The inventors found that it is possible to obtain anapproximate polynomial expression with precision of about 0.1% by usinga third expression. Specifically, the function f(nr) is expressed by athird expression as represented by the following formula (8), and theinverse number 1/f(nr) of the function f(nr) is expressed by a thirdexpression as represented by the following formula (9).f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (8)1/f(n)=0.1045n ³−0.6096n ²+2.0192n−1.0979  (9)

To simplify the expressions, in the formula (8) and the formula (9), therefractive index “nr” is abbreviated as “n”.

As shown in FIG. 10, approximation of the function f(nr) expressed bysix points normally corresponds to approximation of a fifth expression.However, as the order is increased, the function f(nr) may fluctuate orthe calculation thereof may become complex. On the other hand, as theorder is reduced, precision of the function f(nr) may be lowered.

The invention has been made based on a necessary and sufficientcondition that thickness precision of a disc is about 0.1 μm.Accordingly, securing precision higher than the required value ismeaningless. In view of this, the inventors derived the aforementionedformulas (8) and (9), based on a new finding that establishing a thirdexpression is a necessary and sufficient condition to satisfy thicknessprecision of about 0.1 μm.

Specifically, assuming that shape-wise thicknesses of a cover layer andfirst through (N−1)-th intermediate layers of an optical recordingmedium having refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN arerespectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from the surface ofthe optical recording medium where light is incident, the thicknessestr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted into thicknesses t1, t2, . . . ,and tN of layers having a predetermined refractive index “no” whichmakes a divergent amount equal to a divergent amount of a light beamresulting from the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN. Further, adifference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti” through a thickness“tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through a thickness “tm” is set to1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each any positive integersatisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , andtN are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (8), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , andtrN. In the formula (8), n=nr1, nr2, and nrN.

Further, assuming that shape-wise thicknesses of a cover layer and firstthrough (N−1)-th intermediate layers of an optical recording mediumhaving refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectivelytr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from the surface of the opticalrecording medium where light is incident, targeted values of thethicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are calculated by convertingthicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of layers having a predeterminedrefractive index “no” into the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trNwhich makes a divergent amount equal to a divergent amount of a lightbeam resulting from the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN. Further, adifference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti” through a thickness“tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through a thickness “tm” is set to1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each any integer satisfyingi≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN arecalculated by products of the inverse number of the function f(n)expressed by the formula (9), and the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , andtN. In the formula (9), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

As an example, there is described a relation between the thickness t1 ofthe cover layer, and the sum of the thicknesses t2 through t4 of thefirst through the third intermediate layers of the four-layer disc (theoptical recording medium 40). Let us consider a case that all therefractive indexes of the layers are set to a standard refractive index“no” i.e. set to 1.60, the thickness t1 of the cover layer is set to 54μm, the thickness t2 of the first intermediate layer is set to 10 μm,the thickness t3 of the second intermediate layer is set to 21 μm, andthe thickness t4 of the third intermediate layer is set to 19 μm. Thesum of the thickness t2 of the first intermediate layer through thethickness t4 of the third intermediate layer becomes 50 μm. In thiscase, the difference between the thickness t1 of the cover layer, andthe sum of the thicknesses t2 through t4 of the first through the thirdintermediate layers is 4 μm, which is significantly larger than 1 μm.

If, however, the refractive index “nr” of the cover layer is set to1.70, a different result is obtained, even if the shape-wise thicknesstr1 of the cover layer remains the same i.e. set to 54 μm. It isobvious, from the formulas (4) and (6) or from FIG. 10, that thethickness tr1 of a layer having the refractive index “nr” is convertedinto the thickness t1 of a layer having the standard refractive index“no” by multiplying the thickness tr1 by 0.921. As a result, thethickness t1 of the layer having the refractive index “no” is set to:t1=0.921×tr1=49.7 μm, which is smaller than 50 μm i.e. the sum of thethicknesses t2 through t4 of the first through the third intermediatelayers.

Conversely, it is obvious from the formulas (5) and (7) or from FIG. 11that a difference between the thickness t1 of the cover layer, and thesum of the thicknesses t2 through t4 of the first through the thirdintermediate layers is set to 1 μm or more, and the thickness t1 of thecover layer is set to 51 μm or more by multiplying the thickness t1 of alayer having the refractive index “no” by 1.086. In other words, thethickness tr1 of the layer having the refractive index “nr” is set to:tr1=51×1.086≈55.4 μm. Accordingly, it is necessary to set the shape-wisethickness tr1 of the cover layer to 55.4 μm or more, in the case wherethe refractive index “nr” is set to 1.70. The above example is merely anexample, and the invention may embrace a value parameter other than theabove. Further, in the case where the refractive index is a numericalvalue other than the ones shown in FIG. 10 or FIG. 11, a factor may becalculated by substituting the refractive index in the formula (8) orthe formula (9).

It is also necessary to satisfy a specific condition about the thicknessof the cover layer and the thicknesses of the intermediate layers fromanother aspect. It is desirable to set the cover layer thickness and theintermediate layer thicknesses in a predetermined range including astandard value to perform a stable focus jumping operation. A focusjumping operation is an operation of changing a focus position from acertain information recording surface to another information recordingsurface. In performing a focus jumping operation, it is desirable tosecure a focus error signal of good quality with respect to a targetedinformation recording surface by e.g. moving a collimator lens 53 priorto a focus jumping operation to stably obtain a focus error signal withrespect to the targeted information recording surface. In view of this,it is desirable to set a difference in spherical aberration betweeninformation recording surfaces in a predetermined range.

If the refractive index is changed, the spherical aberration amount ischanged, even if the thickness is unchanged. Accordingly, it isdesirable to set a targeted value or an allowable range of anintermediate layer thickness in such a manner that the sphericalaberration amount lies in a predetermined range.

Referring back to the description on the back focus problem, in the casewhere the refractive index of a predetermined layer (the cover layer orthe intermediate layer) is nr(min)≦nr≦nr(max), the thickness “tr” of thelayer having the refractive index “nr” can be obtained by implementingthe formulas: θr(min)=arcsin(NA/nr(min)) and θr(max)=arcsin(NA/nr(max)),and using the formula: to =tr·tan(θr)/tan(θo) in the similar manner asdescribed above. Thus, the thickness range of the intermediate layersmay be determined.

The optical recording medium in the embodiment is not limited to one ofa rewritable disc, a recordable disc, and a read only disc, but may beany of these discs.

As described above, signal fluctuation and signal quality deteriorationresulting from the back focus problem occur, in the case where the sizesor the shapes are the same with each other between signal light, andreflected light from the other information recording surface on thephotodetector. A state that the sizes or the shapes are the same witheach other between signal light, and reflected light from the otherinformation recording surface on the photodetector means a state thatfocus positions appear to be the same with each other between signallight, and reflected light from the other information recording surface,including a virtual image of reflected light from the other informationrecording surface. Optical paths of signal light and reflected lightfrom the other information recording surface are partly different fromeach other in a transparent substrate of an optical disc. In the casewhere defocus amounts resulting from a difference in optical path areequal to each other, the focus position of signal light, and the focusposition of reflected light from the other information recording surfaceappear to be the same with each other. In the case where divergences ofconvergent light i.e. the radii of convergent light are the same witheach other between signal light, and reflected light from the otherinformation recording surface, it is determined that defocus amountsresulting from a substrate thickness are equal to each other.

In view of the above, calculation based on the divergent radius R of alight spot resulting from a substrate thickness is made in order todetermine whether the back focus problem can be avoided by setting theshape-wise thickness “tr” in terms of the refractive index “nr”. In thisexample, the shape-wise thickness indicates a material thickness, andmay also be called as a physical thickness.

An interlayer coherence resulting from a reduced intermediate layerthickness can be avoided, if the spot configuration (the radius R) on anadjacent layer is sufficiently large. In view of this, calculation basedon the divergent radius R of a light spot resulting from a substratethickness is made in order to determine whether the interlayer coherencecan be avoided by setting the shape-wise thickness “tr” in terms of therefractive index “nr”.

Assuming that the thickness of a cover layer or an intermediate layer is“t”, the numerical aperture of a light spot is NA (NA=0.85), and theconvergence angle of light in a substrate is θ, since NA=n·sin(θ),θ=arcsin(NA/n). In this formula, “arcsin” represents an inverse sinefunction. The divergent radius R of a light spot can be calculated byR=t·tan(θ).

The standard refractive index is defined as “no”, the thickness of alayer having the standard refractive index “no” is defined as “to”, andthe convergence angle of light in a substrate of the layer is defined as“θo”. The standard refractive index “no” is set to e.g. 1.60. The layer(targeted layer) constituting a thickness portion of a transparentsubstrate of an actual optical disc is indicated with the suffix “r”,the refractive index of the targeted layer is defined as “nr”, theshape-wise thickness of the targeted layer is defined as “tr”, and theconvergence angle of light in a substrate is defined as “θr”. In thiscase, the convergence angles θo and θr are respectively expressed by:θo=arcsin(NA/no) and θr=arcsin(NA/nr).

The divergent radius R of a light spot is expressed by:R=tr·tan(θr)=to·tan(θ0). Accordingly, the thickness “to” of a layerhaving the standard refractive index “no” is expressed by: to=tr·tan(θr)/tan(θo))=tr·f(nr).

The function f(nr) is a factor for deriving the thickness “to” of alayer having the standard refractive index “no” with respect to theshape-wise thickness “tr”, and is the function shown in the graph ofFIG. 10.

For instance, let us consider a four-layer disc having four layers ofinformation recording surfaces. The four-layer disc (the opticalrecording medium 40) has, in the order from the surface (a lightincident surface) 40 z of the disc, the first information recordingsurface 40 a, the second information recording surface 40 b, the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c, and the fourth information recordingsurface 40 d. The four-layer disc is further provided with the coverlayer 42 between the light incident surface 40 z and the firstinformation recording surface 40 a, the first intermediate layer 43between the first information recording surface 40 a and the secondinformation recording surface 40 b, the second intermediate layer 44between the second information recording surface 40 b and the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c, and the third intermediate layer 45between the third information recording surface 40 c and the fourthinformation recording surface 40 d.

Let it be assumed that the shape-wise thickness of the cover layer 42 istr1, and the actual refractive index of the cover layer 42 is nr1; theshape-wise thickness of the first intermediate layer 43 is tr2, and theactual refractive index of the first intermediate layer 43 is nr2; theshape-wise thickness of the second intermediate layer 44 is tr3, and theactual refractive index of the second intermediate layer 44 is nr3; andthe shape-wise thickness of the third intermediate layer 45 is tr4, andthe actual refractive index of the third intermediate layer 45 is nr4.

Converting the thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of the cover layer 42and the first through the third intermediate layers 43 through 45respectively into the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 of the cover layer42 and the first through the third intermediate layers 43 through 45each having the standard refractive index “no”, based on a defocusamount, yields a result: t1=tr1×f(nr1), t2=tr2×f(nr2), t3=tr3×f(nr3),and t4=tr4×f(nr4).

Normally, the thickness of the cover layer is larger than the thicknessof the intermediate layer. In view of this, the four-layer disc shouldsatisfy all the conditions: |t1−(t2+t3+t4)|≧1 μm, |t2−t3|≧1 μm,|t3−t4)|≧1 μm, and |t2−t4|≧1 μm to avoid the back focus problem.

Further, the four-layer disc should satisfy all the conditions: t2≧10μm, t3≧10 μm, and t4≧10 μm to avoid the interlayer coherence. In otherwords, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 of the cover layer 42, thefirst intermediate layer 43, the second intermediate layer 44, and thethird intermediate layer 45 are each set to 10 μm or more.

As described above, the optical recording medium 40 includes the firstinformation recording surface 40 a closest to the light incident surface40 z of the optical recording medium 40, the second informationrecording surface 40 b second closest to the surface 40 z, the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c third closest to the surface 40 z,the fourth information recording surface 40 d fourth closest to thesurface 40 z, the cover layer 42 having a refractive index nr1 differentfrom the predetermined refractive index “no” and formed between thesurface 40 z and the first information recording surface 40 a, the firstintermediate layer 43 having a refractive index nr2 different from therefractive index “no” and formed between the first information recordingsurface 40 a and the second information recording surface 40 b, thesecond intermediate layer 44 having a refractive index nr3 differentfrom the refractive index “no” and formed between the second informationrecording surface 40 b and the third information recording surface 40 c,and the third intermediate layer 45 having a refractive index nr4different from the refractive index “no” and formed between the thirdinformation recording surface 40 c and the fourth information recordingsurface 40 d.

Further, the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of the coverlayer 42, the first intermediate layer 43, the second intermediate layer44, and the third intermediate layer 45 are respectively converted intothe thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 of the respective layers having thepredetermined refractive index “no”.

Furthermore, a defocus amount generated in a layer having a refractiveindex nrα and a thickness trα (satisfying: 1≦α≦4 (where α is a positiveinteger)) is equal to a defocus amount generated in a layer having therefractive index “no” and a thickness tα (satisfying: 1≦α≦4 (where α isa positive integer)).

Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 satisfy|t1−(t2+t3+t4)|≧1 μm, a difference between any two values of thethicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 is set to 1 μm or more in any case, and|(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm.

Thus, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 obtained by converting theshape-wise thickness tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of the cover layer 42, thefirst intermediate layer 43, the second intermediate layer 44, and thethird intermediate layer 45 satisfy |t1−(t2+t3+t4)|≧1 μm, a differencebetween any two values of the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 is set to 1μm or more in any case, and |(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm. This enables toprevent light from forming an image on the backside of the surface ofthe optical recording medium, and suppress coherence between reflectedlight from the information recording surfaces to thereby improve thequality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal.

Further, since the distance between the surface of the optical recordingmedium, and the information recording surface closest to the surface ofthe optical recording medium can be set to a large value, deteriorationof a reproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smearon the surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

Further, in the case where the thickness of a layer having therefractive index nrα is set to trα (satisfying: 1≦α≦4 (where αis apositive integer)), the convergence angle of light in the layer havingthe refractive index nrα is set to θrα (satisfying: 1≦α≦4 (where α is apositive integer)), the thickness of a layer having the refractive index“no” is set to tα (satisfying: 1≦α≦4 (where αis a positive integer)),and the convergence angle of light in the layer having the refractiveindex “no” is set to θo, the thickness trα is converted into thethickness tα based on the following formula (10).tα=trα·(tan(θrα)/tan(θo))  (10)

Preferably, the range of the thickness tα of a layer having therefractive index “no” and whose spherical aberration amount lies in apredetermined allowable range may be converted into a range of thethickness trα of a layer having the refractive index nrα, and thethickness trα may be included in the range of the thickness trα afterconversion.

Generally, it is necessary to set the performance of a light spot in therange of the Marechal Criteria. If the performance of a light spotexceeds the range of the Marechal Criteria, a signal may be extremelydeteriorated. In view of this, the ranges of the respective conditionsare defined in such a manner that a spherical aberration amountgenerated in a layer having the refractive index “no” lies in a range of70 mλ or less, which is the range of the Marechal Criteria.

In this embodiment, the refractive indexes nr1, nr2, nr3, and nr4 areeach different from the refractive index “no”. The invention is notspecifically limited to the above. Alternatively, the refractive indexesnr1, nr2, nr3, and nr4 may each be equal to the refractive index “no”.The modification is advantageous in that the manufacturing method forthe optical recording medium can be standardized without depending onthe value of the refractive index.

As another example, let us consider a case that a three-layer dischaving three recording layers is produced. A three-layer disc (theoptical recording medium 30) has, in the order from the surface (a lightincident surface) 30 z of the disc, the first information recordingsurface 30 a, the second information recording surface 30 b, and thethird information recording surface 30 c. The three-layer disc isfurther provided with the cover layer 32 between the light incidentsurface 30 z and the first information recording surface 30 a, the firstintermediate layer 33 between the first information recording surface 30a and the second information recording surface 30 b, and the secondintermediate layer 34 between the second information recording surface30 b and the third information recording surface 30 c.

Let it be assumed that the shape-wise thickness of the cover layer 32 istr1, and the actual refractive index of the cover layer 32 is nr1; theshape-wise thickness of the first intermediate layer 33 is tr2, and theactual refractive index of the first intermediate layer 33 is nr2; andthe shape-wise thickness of the second intermediate layer 34 is tr3, andthe actual refractive index of the second intermediate layer 34 is nr3.

Converting the thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer 32, thefirst intermediate layer 33, and the second intermediate layer 34respectively into the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 of the cover layer 32,the first intermediate layer 33, and the second intermediate layer 34each having the standard refractive index “no”, based on a defocusamount, yields a result: t1=tr1×f(nr1), t2=tr2×f(nr2), andt3=tr3×f(nr3).

Normally, the thickness of the cover layer is larger than the thicknessof the intermediate layer. In view of this, the three-layer disc shouldsatisfy all the conditions: |t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm, and |t2−t3|≧1 μm to avoidthe back focus problem.

Further, the three-layer disc should satisfy all the conditions: t2≧10μm, and t3≧10 μm to avoid the interlayer coherence. In other words, thethicknesses t1, t2, and t3 of the cover layer 32, the first intermediatelayer 33, and the second intermediate layer 34 are each set to 10 μm ormore.

As described above, the optical recording medium 30 includes the firstinformation recording surface 30 a closest to the light incident surface30 z of the optical recording medium 30, the second informationrecording surface 30 b second closest to the surface 30 z, the thirdinformation recording surface 30 c third closest to the surface 30 z,the cover layer 32 having a refractive index nr1 different from thepredetermined refractive index “no” and formed between the surface 30 zand the first information recording surface 30 a, the first intermediatelayer 33 having a refractive index nr2 different from the refractiveindex “no” and formed between the first information recording surface 30a and the second information recording surface 30 b, and the secondintermediate layer 34 having a refractive index nr3 different from therefractive index “no” and formed between the second informationrecording surface 30 b and the third information recording surface 30 c.

Further, the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer32, the first intermediate layer 33, and the second intermediate layer34 are respectively converted into the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 of therespective layers having the predetermined refractive index “no”.

Furthermore, a defocus amount generated in a layer having the refractiveindex nrα and the thickness trα (satisfying: 1≦α≦3 (where α is apositive integer)) is equal to a defocus amount generated in a layerhaving the refractive index “no” and the thickness tα (satisfying: 1≦α≦3(where α is a positive integer)).

Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 satisfy |t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm,and a difference between any two values of the thicknesses t1, t2, andt3 is set to 1 μm or more in any case.

Thus, the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 obtained by converting theshape-wise thickness tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer 32, the firstintermediate layer 33, and the second intermediate layer 34 satisfy|t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm, and a difference between any two values of thethicknesses t1, t2, and t3 is set to 1 μm or more in any case. Thisenables to prevent light from forming an image on the backside of thesurface of the optical recording medium, and suppress coherence betweenreflected light from the information recording surfaces to therebyimprove the quality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal.

Further, since the distance between the surface of the optical recordingmedium and the information recording surface closest to the surface ofthe optical recording medium can be set to a large value, deteriorationof a reproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smearon the surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

Further, in the case where the thickness of a layer having therefractive index nrα is set to trα (satisfying: 1≦α≦3 (where α is apositive integer)), the convergence angle of light in the layer havingthe refractive index nrα is set to θrα (satisfying: 1≦α≦3 (where α is apositive integer)); the thickness of a layer having the refractive index“no” is set to tα (satisfying: 1≦α≦3 (where α is a positive integer)),and the convergence angle of light in the layer having the refractiveindex “no” is set to θo, the thickness trα is converted into thethickness to based on the following formula (11).tα=trα·(tan(θrα)/tan(θo))  (11)

In the three-layer disc as well as the four-layer disc, preferably, therange of the thickness to of a layer having the refractive index “no”and whose spherical aberration amount lies in a predetermined allowablerange may be converted into a range of the thickness trα of a layerhaving the refractive index nrα, and the thickness trα may be includedin the range of the thickness trα after conversion.

In the case where the layer between the medium surface and theinformation recording surface or each layer between the informationrecording surfaces is constituted of plural material layers havingrefractive indexes different from each other, at first, the thicknessesof the material layers are calculated in terms of the standardrefractive index. Specifically, the actual thickness of each materiallayer having the refractive index “nr” is converted into the thicknessof each material layer having the standard refractive index “no”, basedon a defocus amount, by multiplying the shape-wise thickness by thefunction value “f”. Then, the thicknesses of the material layers afterconversion are integrated.

For instance, in the case where a cover layer having the shape-wisethickness tr1 is constituted of a first cover layer having the thicknesstr11 and the refractive index nr11, a second cover layer having thethickness tr12 and the refractive index nr12 . . . , and the N-th coverlayer having the thickness tr1N and the refractive index nr1N,converting the shape-wise thickness of the cover layer into thethickness t1 of the cover layer having the standard refractive index“no”, based on a defocus amount, yields a result: t1=Σtr1 k×f(nrk). Inthis formula, Σ represents an integration from 1 through N with respectto “k”.

In the case where an objective lens having a large numerical aperture(NA) is used, spherical aberration sharply changes depending on thethickness of a transparent substrate through which light is transmitted.If the spherical aberration is large, the sensitivity of a focus errorsignal, serving as an index to be used in focus control, may bedifferent from the design sensitivity, or focus error signaldeterioration such as a decrease in signal amplitude may occur.

Accordingly, in the case where focus control is started from a statethat focus control is not performed, or stability in focus jumping isobtained, it is desirable to correct spherical aberration with respectto a targeted layer for focus control in advance. In view of this, it isdesirable to set the thickness from the medium surface to an informationrecording layer, and the thickness of an intermediate layer in apredetermined range including a standard value.

The focus jumping operation is an operation of changing a focus positionfrom a certain information recording surface to another informationrecording surface. The standard value or a predetermined range for afocus jumping operation should be defined, referring to the sphericalaberration for the above reason. Accordingly, in the case where therefractive index is set to a value other than the standard value, theshape-wise thickness is changed depending on the refractive index.

In view of the above, for instance, the layer thickness of a multilayeroptical disc is designed as follows. First, the refractive index of amaterial constituting a transparent substrate is defined. Next, theshape-wise thickness from the medium surface to an information recordingsurface, and the shape-wise thicknesses of intermediate layers aredetermined in accordance with the obtained refractive index, referringto the spherical aberration. Since it is impossible to set a productionerror to zero, the shape-wise thickness is determined including an errorrange. The shape-wise thickness from the medium surface to aninformation recording surface, and the shape-wise thicknesses ofintermediate layers may be determined, using a numerical value table ora chart. The spherical aberration is proportional to the layerthickness. Accordingly, the shape-wise thickness from the medium surfaceto an information recording surface, and the shape-wise thicknesses ofintermediate layers may be determined by calculating a conversion factorg(nr) depending on a refractive index in accordance with a wavelength ora numerical aperture, and using the calculated conversion factor g(nr).

For instance, blue light of a wavelength 405 nm is converged on aninformation recording surface through a substrate having a refractiveindex of 1.60 and a thickness of 0.1 mm. An objective lens having anumerical aperture of 0.85 converges blue light of a wavelength 405 nmwithout aberration. The thickness ts(nr) (unit: mm) of a substrate whichminimizes the aberration when the refractive index of the substrate ischanged is calculated. As a result of the calculation, the conversionfactor g(nr) is set to: g(nr)=ts(nr)/0.1.

FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing a refractive index dependenceof a factor for converting a shape-wise thickness in terms of an actualrefractive index into a thickness in terms of a standard refractiveindex, based on a spherical aberration. FIG. 12 shows a conversionfactor g(nr) derived by the inventors. Since both of the conversionfactor g(nr) and the inverse number (1/g(nr)) of the conversion factorg(nr) have a smooth curve, the conversion factor g(nr) and the inversenumber (1/g(nr)) of the conversion factor g(nr) can be expressed bypolynomial expressions. The inventors found that it is possible toobtain an approximate polynomial expression with precision of about 0.1%by using a third expression. Specifically, the function g(nr) isexpressed by a third expression as represented by the following formula(12).g(n)=−1.1111n ³+5.8143n ²−9.8808n+6.476  (12)

To simplify the expressions, in the formula (12), the refractive index“nr” is abbreviated as “n”.

A proper relation between a substrate thickness and a refractive indexis also disclosed in JP 2004-288371A and JP 2004-259439A. However, therelation between a substrate thickness and a refractive index disclosedin JP 2004-288371A and JP 2004-259439A is different from the formula(12). Accordingly, the relation between a substrate thickness and arefractive index disclosed in JP 2004-288371A and JP 2004-259439A doesnot accurately express the relation between a substrate thickness and arefractive index, which makes a spherical aberration constant, as shownin FIG. 12. In this embodiment, a substrate thickness which makes athird-order spherical aberration constant is obtained depending on arefractive index by actually tracing a light ray, without performing anapproximation. Thus, in this embodiment, the accurate relation between asubstrate thickness and a refractive index is successfully defined.

The thicknesses of the cover layer and the first through the (N−1)-thintermediate layers are set in such a range that spherical aberrationlies in a predetermined range. Targeted values of the thicknesses tr1,tr2, . . . , and trN are calculated by products of the thicknesses t1,t2, . . . , and tN, and the function g(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (12) to set the thicknesses of the cover layerand the first through the (N−1)-th intermediate layers in such a rangethat spherical aberration lies in a predetermined range. In the formula(12), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

The shape-wise thickness of a cover layer can be obtained, based on theshape-wise thickness from the medium surface to an information recordingsurface, and the shape-wise thicknesses of intermediate layers, whichhave been calculated in the above-described manner. Then, thesethicknesses are converted into thicknesses of the respectivecorresponding layers each having the standard refractive index “no”,referring to a defocus amount in the above-described manner.Alternatively, the shape-wise thicknesses of the cover layer and theintermediate layers of an actually fabricated optical disc may beobtained. Then, determination is made as to whether the back focusproblem and the interlayer coherence as described above can be avoided,whether the design range is proper, and whether the quality of thefabricated optical disc has passed, using the thicknesses of therespective corresponding layers after conversion.

The thickness from the medium surface to an information recordingsurface can be calculated based on the sum of the cover layer thicknessand the intermediate layer thicknesses. In the case of a three-layerdisc, the shape-wise thickness from the medium surface to the firstinformation recording surface is set to tr1, the shape-wise thicknessfrom the medium surface to the second information recording surface isset to (tr1+tr2), and the shape-wise thickness from the medium surfaceto the third information recording surface is set to (tr1+tr2+tr3).

In the case of a four-layer disc, the shape-wise thickness from themedium surface to the first information recording surface is set to tr1,the shape-wise thickness from the medium surface to the secondinformation recording surface is set to (tr1+tr2), the shape-wisethickness from the medium surface to the third information recordingsurface is set to (tr1+tr2+tr3), and the shape-wise thickness from themedium surface to the fourth information recording surface is set to(tr1+tr2+tr3+tr4).

The optical recording medium in the embodiment enables to prevent lightfrom forming an image on the backside of the surface of the opticalrecording medium, and suppress coherence between reflected light fromthe information recording surfaces to thereby improve the quality of aservo signal and a reproduction signal. Further, in the abovearrangement, a guideline for producing the products can be clearly setby setting the guideline for designing the thickness of the opticalrecording medium depending on the refractive index in theabove-described manner.

As described above, the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 ofthe cover layer 42, the first intermediate layer 43, the secondintermediate layer 44, and the third intermediate layer 45 of theoptical recording medium 40 having four information recording surfacesare determined depending on the refractive indexes nr1, nr2, nr3, andnr4, referring to a spherical aberration. Then, the thicknesses tr1,tr2, tr3, and tr4 are respectively converted into the thicknesses t1,t2, t3, and t4 of the respective layers having the predeterminedrefractive index “no”, referring to a defocus amount. Then, thethicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 are calculated by products of thethicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4, and the function g(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (12) to set the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4in such a range that the spherical aberration lies in a predeterminedrange. Thereafter, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 are calculated byproducts of the function f(n) expressed by the above-described formula(8), and the calculated thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4. Further, there-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 satisfy the followingformula (13).|(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm  (13)

Further, the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer32, the first intermediate layer 33, and the second intermediate layer34 of the optical recording medium 30 having three information recordingsurfaces are determined depending on the refractive indexes nr1, nr2,and nr3, referring to a spherical aberration. Then, the thicknesses tr1,tr2, and tr3 are respectively converted into the thicknesses t1, t2, andt3 of the respective layers having the predetermined refractive index“no”, referring to a defocus amount. Then, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, andtr3 are calculated by products of the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3, andthe function g(n) expressed by the above-described formula (12) to setthe thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 in such a range that the sphericalaberration lies in a predetermined range. Thereafter, the thicknessest1, t2, and t3 are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressedby the above-described formula (8), and the calculated thicknesses tr1,tr2, and tr3. Further, the re-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, and t3satisfy the following formula (14).|t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm  (14)

Next, an example of an optical information device which performs a focusjumping operation is described.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a schematic arrangement of an opticalinformation device embodying the invention. The optical informationdevice 150 reproduces or records information with respect to pluralinformation recording surfaces by moving a light spot of laser light tobe irradiated onto the optical recording medium 40 from a predeterminedinformation recording surface to another information recording surfaceof the optical recording medium 40.

The optical information device 150 converges a light spot of laser lightonto a predetermined information recording surface of the pluralinformation recording surfaces to reproduce information from thepredetermined information recording surface. In the case whereinformation is reproduced from another information recording surface ofthe plural information recording surfaces different from thepredetermined information recording surface, the optical informationdevice 150 shifts the light spot of laser light from the predeterminedinformation recording surface to the another information recordingsurface to reproduce the information from the another informationrecording surface.

The optical information device 150 includes a driving device 151, aturntable 152, an electric circuit 153, a clamper 154, a motor 155, andan optical head device 201. The optical head device 201 in FIG. 13 hasthe same arrangement as the arrangement of the optical head device 201shown in FIG. 1, and an optical recording medium 40 in FIG. 13 has thesame arrangement as the arrangement of the optical recording medium 40shown in FIG. 2.

The optical recording medium 40 is placed on the turntable 152, and isfixedly supported by the clamper 154. The motor 155 rotates theturntable 152 to thereby rotate the optical recording medium 40. Thedriving device 151 coarsely drives the optical head device 201 to atrack on the optical recording medium 40 where intended information isrecorded.

The optical head device 201 shifts the focus position of laser light tobe irradiated onto the optical recording medium from a certaininformation recording surface to another information recording surfaceto reproduce or record information with respect to the pluralinformation recording surfaces.

The optical head device 201 transmits a focus error signal and atracking error signal to the electric circuit 153 in correspondence to apositional relation with respect to the optical recording medium 40. Theelectric circuit 153 transmits a signal for finely moving the objectivelens 56 to the optical head device 201 in accordance with the focuserror signal and the tracking error signal. The optical head device 201performs focus control and tracking control with respect to the opticalrecording medium 40, based on a signal from the electric circuit 153.The optical head device 201 reads out information from the opticalrecording medium 40, writes (records) information into the opticalrecording medium 40, or erases information from the optical recordingmedium 40.

The electric circuit 153 controls and drives the motor 155 and theoptical head device 201, based on a signal to be obtained from theoptical head device 201. The electric circuit 153 mainly controls thefocus jumping sequence. Specifically, the electric circuit 153 controlsthe optical head device 201 in such a manner as to correct sphericalaberration generated in an information recording surface as a focusjumping destination, before shifting the focus position. A concretespherical aberration correction method for the optical head device 201has been described in the foregoing description.

The optical information device 150 in the embodiment is operable tocorrect spherical aberration generated in an information recordingsurface as a focus jumping destination by shifting the collimator lens53 with respect to the optical recording medium 40 before a focusjumping operation is performed, and thereafter shift the focus position.This enables to improve the quality of a focus error signal with respectto a targeted information recording surface to thereby stably perform afocus jumping operation.

The aforementioned embodiment mainly includes the features having thefollowing arrangements.

A manufacturing method for an optical recording medium according to anaspect of the invention is a manufacturing method for an opticalrecording medium having (N−1) (where N is a positive integer of 4 ormore) information recording surfaces, wherein, assuming that shape-wisethicknesses of a cover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediatelayers of the optical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1,nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in theorder from a surface of the optical recording medium where light isincident, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted intothicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of layers having a predeterminedrefractive index “no” which makes a divergent amount equal to adivergent amount of a light beam resulting from the thicknesses tr1,tr2, . . . , and trN; a difference DFF between the sum of thicknesses tithrough tj, and the sum of thicknesses tk through tm is 1 μm or more(where i, j, k, and m are each any positive integer satisfyingi≦j<k≦m≦N); and the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN are calculated byproducts of a function f(n) expressed by the following formula (15), andthe thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN:f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (15)

in the formula (15), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

In the above arrangement, assuming that shape-wise thicknesses of acover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediate layers of theoptical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , andnrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from asurface of the optical recording medium where light is incident, thethicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted into thicknesses t1,t2, . . . , and tN of layers having a predetermined refractive index“no” which makes a divergent amount equal to a divergent amount of alight beam resulting from the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN.Further, a difference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti” through athickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through a thickness “tm”is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each any positiveinteger satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, . .. , and tN are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressed bythe above-described formula (15), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . ,and trN.

As described above, since the difference DFF between the sum of thethickness “ti” through the thickness “tj”, and the sum of the thickness“tk” through the thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more, it is possibleto prevent light from forming an image on the backside of the surface ofthe optical recording medium, and suppress coherence between reflectedlight from the information recording surfaces to thereby improve thequality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal. Further, since thedistance between the surface of the optical recording medium and theinformation recording surface closest to the surface of the opticalrecording medium can be set to a large value, deterioration of areproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smear onthe surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

A manufacturing method for an optical recording medium according toanother aspect of the invention is a manufacturing method for an opticalrecording medium having (N−1) (where N is a positive integer of 4 ormore) information recording surfaces, wherein, assuming that shape-wisethicknesses of a cover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediatelayers of the optical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1,nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in theorder from a surface of the optical recording medium where light isincident, targeted values of the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trNare calculated by converting thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN oflayers having a predetermined refractive index “no” into the thicknessestr1, tr2, . . . , and trN which makes a divergent amount equal to adivergent amount of a light beam resulting from the thicknesses t1, t2,. . . , and tN; a difference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti”through a thickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through athickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each anypositive integer satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N); and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, .. . , and trN are calculated by products of an inverse number 1/f(n) ofa function f(n) expressed by the following formula (16), and thethicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN:1/f(n)=0.1045n ³−0.6096n ²+2.0192n−1.0979  (16)

in the formula (16), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

In the above arrangement, assuming that shape-wise thicknesses of acover layer and first through (N−1)-th intermediate layers of theoptical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , andnrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from asurface of the optical recording medium where light is incident,targeted values of the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN arecalculated by converting thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of layershaving a predetermined refractive index “no” into the thicknesses tr1,tr2, . . . , and trN which makes a divergent amount equal to a divergentamount of a light beam resulting from the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . ,and tN. Further, a difference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti”through a thickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through athickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each anypositive integer satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknessestr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are calculated by products of an inversenumber 1/f(n) of the function f(n) expressed by the above-describedformula (16), and the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN.

As described above, since the difference DFF between the sum of thethickness “ti” through the thickness “tj”, and the sum of the thickness“tk” through the thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more, it is possibleto prevent light from forming an image on the backside of the surface ofthe optical recording medium, and suppress coherence between reflectedlight from the information recording surfaces to thereby improve thequality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal. Further, since thedistance between the surface of the optical recording medium and theinformation recording surface closest to the surface of the opticalrecording medium can be set to a large value, deterioration of areproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smear onthe surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

In the manufacturing method for an optical recording medium, preferably,thicknesses of the cover layer and the first through the (N−1)-thintermediate layers may be set in such a range that a sphericalaberration lies in a predetermined range.

In the above arrangement, since the thicknesses of the cover layer andthe first through the (N−1)-th intermediate layers are set in such arange that a spherical aberration lies in a predetermined range, it ispossible to suppress the spherical aberration in the cover layer and thefirst through the (N−1)-th intermediate layers having the thicknessestr1, tr2, . . . , and trN.

In the manufacturing method for an optical recording medium, preferably,targeted values of the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN may becalculated by products of the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN, and afunction g(n) expressed by the following formula (17) to set thicknessesof the cover layer and the first through the (N−1)-th intermediatelayers in such a range that a spherical aberration lies in apredetermined range:g(n)=−1.1111n ³+5.8143n ²−9.8808n+6.476  (17)

in the formula (17), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

In the above arrangement, targeted values of the thicknesses tr1, tr2, .. . , and trN are calculated by products of the thicknesses t1, t2, . .. , and tN, and the function g(n) expressed by the above-describedformula (17) to set thicknesses of the cover layer and the first throughthe (N−1)-th intermediate layers in such a range that a sphericalaberration lies in a predetermined range.

The above arrangement enables to easily calculate the targeted values ofthe thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN capable of suppressing thespherical aberration.

In the manufacturing method for an optical recording medium, preferably,the refractive index “no” may be set to 1.60.

In the above arrangement, it is possible to convert the shape-wisethicknesses of the cover layer and the first through the (N−1)-thintermediate layers into the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of therespective layers having a refractive index of 1.60.

In the manufacturing method for an optical recording medium, preferably,the thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN may each be set to 10 μm or more.

In the above arrangement, it is possible to reduce an influence ofcrosstalk from an information recording surface adjacent to the targetedinformation recording surface by setting each of the thicknesses t1, t2,. . . , and tN to 10 μm or more to thereby reduce coherence betweenreflected light from the information recording surfaces.

An optical recording medium according to another aspect of the inventionis an optical recording medium having (N−1) (where N is a positiveinteger of 4 or more) information recording surfaces. The opticalrecording medium includes: a cover layer formed between a surface of theoptical recording medium where light is incident, and the firstinformation recording surface closest to the medium surface; and firstthrough (N−1)-th intermediate layers formed between the respective firstthrough N-th information recording surfaces, wherein, assuming thatshape-wise thicknesses of the cover layer and the first through the(N−1)-th intermediate layers of the optical recording medium havingrefractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectively tr1, tr2,. . . , and trN in the order from the surface of the optical recordingmedium where light is incident, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , andtrN are converted into thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN of layershaving a predetermined refractive index “no” which makes a divergentamount equal to a divergent amount of a light beam resulting from thethicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN; a difference DFF between the sumof a thickness “ti” through a thickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness“tk” through a thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, andm are each any positive integer satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N); and thethicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN are calculated by products of afunction f(n) expressed by the following formula (18), and thethicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN:f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (18)

in the formula (18), n=nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN.

According to the above arrangement, the optical recording mediumincludes a cover layer formed between a surface of the optical recordingmedium where light is incident, and the first information recordingsurface closest to the medium surface; and first through (N−1)-thintermediate layers formed between the respective first through N-thinformation recording surfaces. Assuming that shape-wise thicknesses ofthe cover layer and the first through the (N−1)-th intermediate layersof the optical recording medium having refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . .. , and nrN are respectively tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order fromthe surface of the optical recording medium where light is incident, thethicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN are converted into thicknesses t1,t2, . . . , and tN of layers having a predetermined refractive index“no” which makes a divergent amount equal to a divergent amount of alight beam resulting from the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . , and trN.Further, a difference DFF between the sum of a thickness “ti” through athickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk” through a thickness “tm”is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and m are each any positiveinteger satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N). Furthermore, the thicknesses t1, t2, . .. , and tN are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressed bythe above-described formula (18), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . . . ,and trN.

As described above, since the difference DFF between the sum of thethickness “ti” through the thickness “tj”, and the sum of the thickness“tk” through the thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more, it is possibleto prevent light from forming an image on the backside of the surface ofthe optical recording medium, and suppress coherence between reflectedlight from the information recording surfaces to thereby improve thequality of a servo signal and a reproduction signal. Further, since thedistance between the surface of the optical recording medium and theinformation recording surface closest to the surface of the opticalrecording medium can be set to a large value, deterioration of areproduction signal in the case where there is a damage or a smear onthe surface of the optical recording medium can be suppressed.

An optical recording medium according to another aspect of the inventionis an optical recording medium having a plurality of informationrecording surfaces. The optical recording medium includes a cover layerhaving a refractive index nr1, and formed between a surface of theoptical recording medium where light is incident and the firstinformation recording surface closest to the medium surface; a firstintermediate layer having a refractive index nr2, and formed between thefirst information recording surface and the second information recordingsurface second closest to the medium surface; a second intermediatelayer having a refractive index nr3, and formed between the secondinformation recording surface and the third information recordingsurface third closest to the medium surface; and a third intermediatelayer having a refractive index nr4, and formed between the thirdinformation recording surface and the fourth information recordingsurface fourth closest to the medium surface, wherein shape-wisethicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of the cover layer, the firstintermediate layer, the second intermediate layer, and the thirdintermediate layer are respectively determined depending on therefractive indexes nr1, nr2, nr3, and nr4, referring to a sphericalaberration, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 are respectivelyconverted into thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 of the respective layershaving a predetermined refractive index “no”, referring to a defocusamount, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 are calculated byproducts of the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4, and a function g(n)expressed by the following formula (19) to set the thicknesses t1, t2,t3, and t4 in such a range that the spherical aberration lies in apredetermined range, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 are calculatedby products of a function f(n) expressed by the following formula (20),and the calculated thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4, and there-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 satisfy the followingformula (21):g(n)=−1.1111n ³+5.8143n ²−9.8808n+6.476  (19)f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (20)|(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm  (21)

in the formulas (19) and (20), n=nr1, nr2, nr3, and nr4.

In the above arrangement, the optical recording medium includes a coverlayer having a refractive index nr1, and formed between a surface of theoptical recording medium where light is incident and the firstinformation recording surface closest to the medium surface; a firstintermediate layer having a refractive index nr2, and formed between thefirst information recording surface and the second information recordingsurface second closest to the medium surface; a second intermediatelayer having a refractive index nr3, and formed between the secondinformation recording surface and the third information recordingsurface third closest to the medium surface; and a third intermediatelayer having a refractive index nr4, and formed between the thirdinformation recording surface and the fourth information recordingsurface fourth closest to the medium surface. Shape-wise thicknessestr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of the cover layer, the first intermediate layer,the second intermediate layer, and the third intermediate layer arerespectively determined depending on the refractive indexes nr1, nr2,nr3, and nr4, referring to a spherical aberration. Further, thethicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 are respectively converted intothicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 of the respective layers having apredetermined refractive index “no”, referring to a defocus amount.Furthermore, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 are calculated byproducts of the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4, and the function g(n)expressed by the above-descried formula (19) to set the thicknesses t1,12, t3, and t4 in such a range that the spherical aberration lies in apredetermined range. Thereafter, the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 arecalculated by products of the function f(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (20), and the calculated thicknesses tr1, tr2,tr3, and tr4, and the re-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4satisfy the above-described formula (21).

As described above, since the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 obtained byconversion from the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, tr3, and tr4 of thecover layer, the first intermediate layer, the second intermediatelayer, and the third intermediate layer satisfy the relation:|(t1+t2)−(t3+t4)|≧1 μm, it is possible to prevent light from forming animage on the backside of the surface of the optical recording medium,and suppress coherence between reflected light from the informationrecording surfaces to thereby improve the quality of a servo signal anda reproduction signal. Further, since the distance between the surfaceof the optical recording medium, and the information recording surfaceclosest to the surface of the optical recording medium can be set to alarge value, deterioration of a reproduction signal in the case wherethere is a damage or a smear on the surface of the optical recordingmedium can be suppressed.

An optical recording medium according to another aspect of the inventionis an optical recording medium having a plurality of informationrecording surfaces. The optical recording medium includes a cover layerhaving a refractive index nr1, and formed between a surface of theoptical recording medium where light is incident and the firstinformation recording surface closest to the medium surface; a firstintermediate layer having a refractive index nr2, and formed between thefirst information recording surface and the second information recordingsurface second closest to the medium surface; and a second intermediatelayer having a refractive index nr3, and formed between the secondinformation recording surface and the third information recordingsurface third closest to the medium surface, wherein shape-wisethicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer, the first intermediatelayer, and the second intermediate layer are respectively determineddepending on the refractive indexes nr1, nr2, and nr3, referring to aspherical aberration, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 are respectivelyconverted into thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 of the respective layershaving a predetermined refractive index “no”, referring to a defocusamount, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 are calculated by products ofthe thicknesses t1, t2, and t3, and a function g(n) expressed by thefollowing formula (22) to set the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 in such arange that the spherical aberration lies in a predetermined range, thethicknesses t1, t2, and t3 are calculated by products of a function f(n)expressed by the following formula (23), and the calculated thicknessestr1, tr2, and tr3, and the re-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, and t3satisfy the following formula (24):g(n)=−1.1111n ³+5.8143n ²−9.8808n+6.476  (22)f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (23)|t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm  (24)

in the formulas (22) and (23), n=nr1, nr2, and nr3.

According to the above arrangement, the optical recording mediumincludes a cover layer having a refractive index nr1, and formed betweena surface of the optical recording medium where light is incident andthe first information recording surface closest to the medium surface; afirst intermediate layer having a refractive index nr2, and formedbetween the first information recording surface and the secondinformation recording surface second closest to the medium surface; anda second intermediate layer having a refractive index nr3, and formedbetween the second information recording surface and the thirdinformation recording surface third closest to the medium surface.Shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of the cover layer, the firstintermediate layer, and the second intermediate layer are respectivelydetermined depending on the refractive indexes nr1, nr2, and nr3,referring to a spherical aberration. The thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3are respectively converted into thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 of therespective layers having a predetermined refractive index “no”,referring to a defocus amount. The thicknesses tr1, t2, and tr3 arecalculated by products of the thicknesses t1, t2, and t3, and thefunction g(n) expressed by the above-described formula (22) to set thethicknesses t1, t2, and t3 in such a range that the spherical aberrationlies in a predetermined range. Thereafter, the thicknesses t1, t2, andt3 are calculated by products of the function f(n) expressed by theabove-described formula (23), and the calculated thicknesses tr1, tr2,and tr3, and the re-calculated thicknesses t1, t2, and t3 satisfy theabove-described formula (24).

As described above, since the thicknesses t1, t2, t3, and t4 obtained byconversion from the shape-wise thicknesses tr1, tr2, and tr3 of thecover layer, the first intermediate layer, and the second intermediatelayer satisfy the relation: |t1−(t2+t3)|≧1 μm, it is possible to preventlight from forming an image on the backside of the surface of theoptical recording medium, and suppress coherence between reflected lightfrom the information recording surfaces to thereby improve the qualityof a servo signal and a reproduction signal. Further, since the distancebetween the surface of the optical recording medium, and the informationrecording surface closest to the surface of the optical recording mediumcan be set to a large value, deterioration of a reproduction signal inthe case where there is a damage or a smear on the surface of theoptical recording medium can be suppressed.

An optical information device according to another aspect of theinvention is an optical information device for reproducing or recordinginformation with respect to the optical recording medium having any oneof the above arrangements, wherein the optical information device movesa light spot of laser light to be irradiated onto the optical recordingmedium from a predetermined information recording surface to anotherinformation recording surface of the plurality of the informationrecording surfaces to thereby reproduce or record information withrespect to the plurality of the information recording surfaces.According to this arrangement, a light spot of laser light to beirradiated onto the optical recording medium is moved from apredetermined information recording surface to another informationrecording surface of the plurality of the information recording surfacesto thereby reproduce or record information with respect to the pluralityof the information recording surfaces.

An information reproducing method according to yet another aspect of theinvention is an information reproducing method for reproducinginformation from the optical recording medium having any one of theabove arrangements. The information reproducing method includes a stepof converging a light spot of laser light onto a predeterminedinformation recording surface of the plurality of information recordingsurfaces; a step of reproducing information from the predeterminedinformation recording surface; and a step of moving the light spot oflaser light from the predetermined information recording surface toanother information recording surface of the optical recording mediumdifferent from the predetermined information recording surface tothereby reproduce information from the another information recordingsurface, in the case where the information is reproduced from theanother information recording surface.

According to the above arrangement, a light spot of laser light isconverged onto a predetermined information recording surface of theplurality of information recording surfaces to reproduce informationfrom the predetermined information recording surface. Further, in thecase where information is reproduced from another information recordingsurface of the optical recording medium different from the predeterminedinformation recording surface, the light spot of laser light is movedfrom the predetermined information recording surface to the anotherinformation recording surface to reproduce the information from theanother information recording surface.

This application is based on U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/236,743filed on Aug. 25, 2009, the contents of which are hereby incorporated byreference.

The embodiments or the examples described in the detailed description ofthe invention are provided to clarify the technical contents of theinvention. The invention should not be construed to be limited to theembodiments or the examples. The invention may be modified in variousways as far as such modifications do not depart from the spirit and thescope of the invention hereinafter defined.

The inventive multilayer optical disc (the inventive optical recordingmedium), the inventive optical recording medium manufacturing method,the inventive optical information device, and the inventive informationreproducing method enable to maximally suppress an influence ofreflected light from an information recording surface other than atargeted information recording surface at the time of reproducing fromthe targeted information recording surface, even if the refractiveindexes of the cover layer and the intermediate layer are different fromthe standard value, to thereby reduce an influence on a servo signal anda reproduction signal to be used in an optical head device. Thus, theinvention is useful to an optical recording medium for informationrecording or reproducing by irradiated light, a manufacturing method forthe optical recording medium, an optical information device forrecording or reproducing information with respect to the opticalrecording medium, and an information reproducing method for reproducinginformation from the optical recording medium.

Thus, the invention provides an optical recording medium capable ofsecuring a reproduction signal of good quality, having a large capacity,and having compatibility with an existing optical recording medium.

What is claimed is:
 1. An optical recording medium having (N−1) (where Nis a positive integer of 4 or more) information recording surfaces,wherein a cover layer formed between a surface of the optical recordingmedium where light is incident, and the first information recordingsurface closest to the medium surface; and first through (N−1)-thintermediate layers formed between the respective first through N-thinformation recording surfaces, the optical recording medium satisfyingassuming that actual thicknesses of the cover layer and the firstthrough the (N−1)-th intermediate layers of the optical recording mediumhaving refractive indexes nr1, nr2, . . . , and nrN are respectivelytr1, tr2, . . . , and trN in the order from the surface of the opticalrecording medium where light is incident, the thicknesses tr1, tr2, . .. , and trN are converted into thicknesses t1, t2, . . . , and tN oflayers having a predetermined refractive index “no”, a defocus valuewith respect to a layer having a refractive index nrα and a thicknesstrα (satisfying: 1≦α≦N), and a defocus value with respect to a layerhaving the refractive index “no” and a thickness tα(satisfying: 1≦α≦N)are the same as each other, a difference DFF between the sum of athickness “ti” through a thickness “tj”, and the sum of a thickness “tk”through a thickness “tm” is set to 1 μm or more (where i, j, k, and mare each any positive integer satisfying i≦j<k≦m≦N), and the thicknessest1, t2, . . . , and tN are calculated by products of a function f(n)expressed by the following formula (4), and the thicknesses tr1, tr2, .. . , and trN:f(n)=−1.088n ³+6.1027n ²−12.042n+9.1007  (4) in the formula (4), n=nr1,nr2, . . . , and nrN.
 2. An optical information device for reproducingor recording information with respect to the optical recording medium ofclaim 1, wherein the optical information device moves a light spot oflaser light to be irradiated onto the optical recording medium from apredetermined information recording surface to another informationrecording surface of the plurality of the information recording surfacesto thereby reproduce or record information with respect to the pluralityof the information recording surfaces.
 3. An information reproducingmethod for reproducing information from the optical recording medium ofclaim 1, the information reproducing method comprising: a step ofconverging a light spot of laser light onto a predetermined informationrecording surface of the plurality of information recording surfaces; astep of reproducing information from the predetermined informationrecording surface; and a step of moving the light spot of laser lightfrom the predetermined information recording surface to anotherinformation recording surface of the optical recording medium differentfrom the predetermined information recording surface to therebyreproduce information from the another information recording surface, inthe case where the information is reproduced from the anotherinformation recording surface.